New Dimensions of FEAR: Conceptual and Intermedial Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2024.1.15-26

Keywords:

fear, concept, Stephen King, intermediality, literary analysis

Abstract

The paper presents a new intermedial perspective on the multidimensional concept of fear in the literary works of modern American writer Stephen King. The intricate and contradictory nature of fear stands at the core of a popular literary genre – horror fiction. The multifaceted nature of the horror genre attests to its inherent complexity, particularly in its exploration of fear. The article addresses the following key functions of horror fiction: 1) to specify the associations arising from the experience of fear, 2) to offer a structured methodological background for examining the given emotion, and 3) to provide a fertile ground for social introspection. It has been justified that the reflective nature of literary texts makes them a representative repository for elucidating specific concepts or social sentiments, hence the growing number of literary pieces reflective of one of the primary human emotions – fear. This correlates with modern social, economic, and technological challenges that have reshaped the past few decades. The conducted research has indicated that shifts and modifications in the perception of fear have found their reflection in horror fiction. The lexicosemantic analysis of the lexemes used by S. King to indicate fear enabled delineating the core and periphery of the concept FEAR. By applying the intermedial perspective and text interpretation techniques, we established the crucial roles of visual and auditory sensory systems in representing the discussed concept by the author and its further perception by the readers. The main conclusion of the paper enables viewing the concept FEAR as a complex semiotic and linguistic artifact, a primary emotion, and a multifaceted psycholinguistic phenomenon. Thus, the concept FEAR resembles an intricate semiotic system that integrates different verbal and non-verbal means. In the paper, fear is understood as a neural and physical reaction in response to internal and external sources of danger, as well as the embodiment of reverence, bewilderment, and despair grounded in different sensorimotor systems. Being a complex psycholinguistic phenomenon of multimodal nature, fear is dynamically represented in literary prose by various intermediality tools that have been evolving in response to social, political, and economic changes in the modern world.

Author Biographies

  • Iryna Biskub , Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

    Professor of the Department of Applied Linguistics at Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University in Lutsk

  • Anna Smoliar, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

    Master of Philology, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University in Lutsk

References

Arvidson, M., Askander, M., Borcak, L. W., Jensen, S. K., & Mousavi N. (2022). Intermedial combinations. In: J. Bruhn & B. Schirrmacher (eds), Intermedial studies: An introduction to meaning across media. Routledge.

Buday, M. (2016). Demystification of Stephen King’s fiction in the context of postmodernism. Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej Univerzity.

Freud, S. (1919). The uncanny. In: Sandner, D. (ed.). (2004). Fantastic literature: A critical reader. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Grogans, S. E., Bliss-Moreau, E., Buss, K. A., Clark, L. A., Fox, A. S., Keltner, D., Cowen, A. S., Kim, J. J., Kragel, P. A., MacLeod, C., Mobbs, D., Naragon-Gainey, K., Fullana, M. A., & Shackman, A. J. (2023). “The nature and neurobiology of fear and anxiety: State of the science and opportunities for accelerating discovery”. In: Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, no 151.

Jackendoff, R. (1989). “What is a concept, that a person may grasp it?”. In: Mind & Language, no 4(1‐2).

Kerahrodi, J. G., & Michal, M. (2020). “The fear-defense system, emotions, and oxidative stress”. In: Redox Biology, no 37.

Kierkegaard, S. (1923). “Fear and Trembling”. In: Selections from the writings of Kierkegaard, (L. M. Hollander, trans.). Comparative Literature Series, 3. Austin, TX: University of Texas. (Original work published: www.gutenberg.org/files/60333/60333-h/60333-h.htm#FEAR_AND_TREMBLING, 06.05.2024.

King, S. (1981). Danse Macabre. Everest House. https://www.worldswithoutend.com/novel.asp?id=24182, 06.05.2024.

King, S. (2007). The Mist. https://wp.nyu.edu/darknessspeaks/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3674/2016/04/King-Stephen-The-Mist.pdf, 06.05.2024.

King, S. (2018). The Outsider. Hodder & Stoughton.

Larue, O., West, R., Rosenbloom, P. S., Dancy, C. L., Samsonovich, A. V., Petters, D., & Juvina, I. (2017). “Emotion in the Common Model of Cognition”. In: Procedia Computer Science, no 145.

Lovecraft, H. R. (1927). Supernatural horror in literature. Project Gutenberg of Australia: EBook. https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0601181h.html, 06.05.2024.

Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Dalgleish, T., Silston, B., & Prévost, C. (2015). “The ecology of human fear: Survival optimization and the nervous system”. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, no 9.

Moyn, S. (2014). The Return of the Prodigal: The 1970s as a turning point in human rights history. In: S. Moyn & J. Eckel (eds), The breakthrough: Human rights in the 1970s. University of Pennsylvania Press

Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. (n. d.). Fear. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/fear_1?q=fear, 06.05.2024.

Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). „The influences of emotion on learning and memory”. In: Frontiers in Psychology, no 8, 1454.

Vorobyova, O. (2010). “Verbal holography in Virginia Woolf’s landscape discourse: Modes, fractals, fusions”. In: Cognition, Communication, Discourse: Series Philology, no 1.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

New Dimensions of FEAR: Conceptual and Intermedial Analysis. (2024). Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal, 1, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2024.1.15-26