Paradoxical Metaphors in Poetic Song Discourse

Авторы

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2023.1.25-37

Ключевые слова:

conceptual metaphors, Leonard Cohen, poetic discourse, song lyrics

Аннотация

The paper focuses on highlighting the differences between recognition and interpretation of active conceptual metaphors indicating universal truth and specific author’s metaphors grounded in his own life experience. It has been proven that due to their complexity, paradoxical nature, and the variability of language expressions metaphors are effectively used to deliver universal truth in poetic discourse, namely in bard song lyrics and singing poetry. The analysis is based on the material of Leonard Cohen’s posthumous album “Thanks for The Dance”. The well-known features of active metaphors such as clarity and communicative power are opposed to unique paradoxical and mirroring metaphors used by the author to impose multiple levels of metaphor recognition in poetics song discourses. The metaphorical coding of poetry is achieved through establishing an intercode agreement between the recipients and the poet.

Биография автора

  • Iryna Biskub , Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University (Ukraine)

    Professor and Chair of the Department of Applied Linguistics at The Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European University in Lutsk (Ukraine)

Библиографические ссылки

Charteris, B. J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goddard, C. (2004). „The ethnopragmatics and semantics of ‘active metaphors”. In: Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, issue 7.

Hallliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Hermes, W. (2019). Leonard Cohen's Profound 'Thanks for the Dance' Is a Posthumous Grace Note. Rolling Stone. November 22. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-album-reviews/leonard-thanks-for-the-dance-916417, 26.03.2023.

Hines, C. (1999). Rebaking the Pie: the WOMAN AS DESSERT metaphor. In: M. Bucholtz, A.C. Liang, A. Laurel, A. Sutton (rds.). Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. Oxford University Press, New York.

Lakoff, G. (1990). “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?” In: Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1).

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Leonard Cohen Obituary. TheGuardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/nov/11/leonard-cohen-obituary, 26.03.2021

McClary, S. (1991). Feminine Endings: Music, Gender, and Sexuality. Minneapolis: U Minnesota P.

Neisser, J. (2003). “The swaying form: Imagination, metaphor, embodiment”. In: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, (2).

Shu-qin, C., Wen-cheng, G. (2022). “Critical Metaphor Analysis in Emily Dickinson’s Poems”. In: Journal of Literature and Art Studies, vol. 12, no. 5).

Steen, G. (1994). Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical Approach. London: Longman.

Steen, G. (2004). „Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition?” In: Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36. issue 7.

Опубликован

2023-11-23

Как цитировать

Paradoxical Metaphors in Poetic Song Discourse. (2023). Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal, 1, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2023.1.25-37